Only ChatGPT? Different Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools and their uses: A review of the scientific literature, 2021 – 2024

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18004/ucsa/2409-8752/2025.012.01.070

Keywords:

Generative Artificial Intelligence, Uses, Instructions, GenAI

Abstract

The research entitled “Only ChatGPT? Different Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools and their uses: A review of the scientific literature, 2021 – 2024” seeks to answer the question What are the different GenAIs available and what are they used for?, with the general objective of identifying the main GenAIs available and what their uses are. Under a qualitative methodology, with a documentary review of 52 articles from the Scopus, ScienceDirect, EBSCOhost, Scielo and Redalyc databases and with the PRISMA method. The main results indicate that the vast majority of research focuses only on analyzing and mentioning ChatGPT as the main GenAI, followed by Bard AI (Gemini) and Copilot, neglecting the large number of other collaborative tools that help to develop specific tasks. Furthermore, research has assumed that users are familiar with the correct way of writing instructions to be given to GenAIs, called Prompts, and do not indicate in their research the process of how to do it, causing many users to obtain incorrect results or to be dissatisfied with the results obtained and, in the worst case, to consider the results valid when they are not correct due to the GIGO effect. Finally, users use GenAIs mostly to search, synthesize, summarize, paraphrase, write new or existing information, generate audio, graphics, images, videos, music, three-dimensional images, detect anti-plagiarism and originality of documents, and translate texts into any language. However, in very few cases they use them to write emails, perform statistical analysis, posts, generate program codes and chatbots, write obituaries, distribute articles or news, write reviews, analyze news, due to their lack of knowledge.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Emilio Chocobar Reyes, Escuela de Negocios Zegel, Dirección General. Lima, Perú

Economista Colegiado Senior en Dirección de Empresas, Maestría en Docencia Universitaria en la Universidad Nacional de Piura (Excelencia) y estudios concluidos en Maestría en Administración de Negocios de la Universidad de Lima (Cum Laude-2° Puesto). Diplomatura en Buen Gobierno de la Universidad Pública en la Universidad Católica (PUCP).  Gestión de Contrataciones del Estado en la PUCP. Asesor y jurado de Tesis en la Universidad Privada del Norte (UPN). Desempeño sobresaliente en evaluación 360° (95%).  Alta habilidad para la estructuración y liderazgo de proyectos, manejo de equipos líderes.

References

Aguilera, E.; Lopezosa, C.; Fernández, J. & Codina, L. (2024). Accelerating research processes with Scopus AI: A place branding case study. Revista Panamericana de Co¬municación, 6(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.21555/rpc.v6i1.3088

Ahmed Ali Linkon, Mujiba Shaima, Md Shohail Uddin Sarker, Badruddowza, Norun Nabi, Md Nasir Uddin Rana, Sandip Kumar Ghosh, Mohammad Anisur Rahman, Hammed Esa, & Faiaz Rahat Chowdhury. (2024). Advancements and Applications of Generative Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Models on Business Management: A Comprehensive Review. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 6(1), 225–232. https://doi.org/10.32996/jcsts.2024.6.1.26

Al Naqbi, H.; Bahroun, Z.; Ahmed, V. (2024). Enhancing Work Productivity through Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Sustainability, 16, 1166. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031166

Alpizar, L. y Martínez, H. (2024). Perspectiva de estudiantes de nivel medio superior respecto al uso de la inteligencia artificial generativa en su aprendizaje. RIDE Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, 14(28). https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v14i28.1830

Aksoy, D. & Kursun, E. (2024). Behind the scenes: A critical perspective on GenAI and Open Educational Practices. Open Praxis, 16(3), 457–470. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.16.3.674

Arias, D.; Ramos, T. y Cangalaya, L. (2024). Análisis y tendencias en el uso de chatbots y agentes conversacionales en el campo de la educación: una revisión bibliométrica. Revista Innovaciones Educativas, 26(41), 242-260. https://dx.doi.org/10.22458/ie.v26i41.5135

Canillas, M. y Canillas, M. (2024). Explorando el potencial de la inteligencia artificial en traumatología: respuestas conversacionales a preguntas específicas. Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2024.05.004

Casas, M.; Priego, A. & Lara, M. (2024). The Revolution in Visual Creation: Generative Artificial Intelligence. Visual Review, 16(4), 227–244.

https://doi.org/10.62161/revvisual.v16.5304

Cetina, R. (2024). Imitadores estadísticos: La cuestión de la autoría y la inteligencia artificial generativa. Una visión comparada entre el derecho de autor de EE.UU. y la Unión Europea. Inteligencia Artificial, 27(73), 14–37. https://doi.org/10.4114/intartif.vol27iss73pp14-37

Chakraborty, D.; Kumar, A.; Patre, S. & Gupta, S. (2024). Enhancing trust in online grocery shopping through generative AI chatbots. Journal of Business Research, 180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114737

Checasaca, J.; Sánchez, L.; Malpartida, J. y Chocobar, E. (2022). Importancia de la herramienta Customer Relationship Management (CRM) en las empresas de Latinoamérica. Una revisión sistemática de la literatura científica los últimos diez años. Revista Científica de la UCSA, 9(3), 97-119. https://doi.org/10.18004/ucsa/2409-8752/2022.009.03.097

Chervenak, J.; Lieman, H.; Blanco, M & Jindal, S. (2023). The promise and peril of using a large language model to obtain clinical information: ChatGPT performs strongly as a fertility counseling tool with limitations. Fertility and Sterility, 120, 575-583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.05.151

Chocobar, E. (2023). Coevaluación y aprendizajes en los estudiantes de la Institución Educativa Zegel Ipae, Lima 2023. Valoración de una experiencia. INNOVA Research Journal, 8(3.1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.33890/innova.v8.n3.1.2023.2305

Costa, I.; Do Nascimento, M.; Treviso, P.; Chini, L.; Roza, B.; Barbosa, S. & Mendes, K. (2024). Uso del Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer en la escritura académica en salud: una revisión de alcance. Revista Latino-americana de Enfermagem, 32, e4194. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7133.4194

Dwivedi, Y.; Kshetri, N.; Hughes, L.; Slade, E. … Wright, R. (2023). So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 1, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

Fosso, S.; Queiroz, M.; Chiappetta, C. & Shi, C. (2023). Are both generative AI and ChatGPT game changers for 21st-Century operations and supply chain excellence? International Journal of Production Economics, 265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.109015

Fosso, S.; Guthrie, C.; Queiroz, M. & Minner, S. (2024). ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence: an exploratory study of key benefits and challenges in operations and supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 62(16), 5676–5696. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2294116

Galdo, B.; Pazos, C.; Pardo, J.; Solar, A.; Llamas, D.; Fernández, E. y Pazos, A. (2024). Inteligencia artificial en pediatría: actualidad y retos. Anales de Pediatría, 100 (3), 195-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpedi.2024.02.006

García, F.; Llorens, F. & Vidal, J. (2024). The new reality of education in the face of advances in generative artificial intelligence. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 27 (1). https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.27.1.37716

Giordano, V.; Spada, I.; Chiarello, F. & Fantoni, G. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT on human skills: A quantitative study on twitter data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123389

González, Y.; Montero, A. & Martinez, J. (2024). Acercando la inteligencia artificial a los servicios de farmacia hospitalaria. Farmacia Hospitalaria, 48 (1), S35-S44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.farma.2024.02.007

Gupta, V. (2024). An Empirical Evaluation of a Generative Artificial Intelligence Technology Adoption Model from Entrepreneurs’ Perspectives. Systems 12, 3:103. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12030103

Gupta, V & Yang, H. (2024) Study protocol for factors influencing the adoption of ChatGPT technology by startups: Perceptions and attitudes of entrepreneurs. PLoS ONE, 19(2): e0298427. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298427

Hassani, H. & Sirimal, E. (2024). Predictions from Generative Artificial Intelligence Models: Towards a New Benchmark in Forecasting Practice. Information 15, 6: 291. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15060291

Hermann, E. & Puntoni, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence and consumer behavior: From predictive to generative AI. Journal of Business Research, 180(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114720

Hernández, R. y Mendoza, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación. Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. 1era Edición. McGraw-Hill. Interamericana Editores, S.A. de C. V. México. ISBN: 978-1-4562-6096-5. https://virtual.cuautitlan.unam.mx/rudics/?p=2612

Horak, J.; Novak, A. & Voumik, L. C. (2023). Healthcare Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Medical Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice 15(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.22381/CRLSJ15120235

Hussain, M. (2023). When, Where, and Which? Navigating the Intersection of Computer Vision and Generative AI for Strategic Business Integration. IEEE Access, 11, 127202-127215. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3332468

Huy, L.; Nguyen, H.; Vo-Thanh, T.; Thinh, N. & Thi Thu Dung, T. (2024). Generative AI, Why, How, and Outcomes: A User Adoption Study. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 16(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.17705/1thci.00198

Hyun, T. & Kim, M. (2023). Is ChatGPT scary good? How user motivations affect creepiness and trust in generative artificial intelligence. Telematics and Informatics, 83, 102030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.102030

Jiménez, N. (2024). El “uso transformador” de las empresas de IA: entre la libertad creativa y los derechos de propiedad intelectual. IDP. Revista de Internet, Derecho y Política, 40. http://dx.doi.org/10.7238/idp.v0i40.421926

Korzynski, P., Mazurek, G., Altmann, A., Ejdys, J., Kazlauskaite, R., Paliszkiewicz, J., Wach, K. & Ziemba, E. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence as a new context for management theories: analysis of ChatGPT. Central European Management Journal, 31 (1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1108/CEMJ-02-2023-0091

Lai, J. (2024). Adapting Self-Regulated Learning in an Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbots. Future Internet, 16, 218. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi16060218

Laker, L. & Sena, M. (2023). Accuracy and detection of student use of ChatGPT in business analytics courses. Issues in Information Systems, 24 (2), 153-163. https://doi.org/10.48009/2_iis_2023_113

Lim, C.; Zhu, Y.-P.; Omar, M.; Park, H.-W. (2024). Decoding the Relationship of Artificial Intelligence, Advertising, and Generative Models. Digital, 4, 244–270. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital4010013

Lopezosa, C., Codina, L., Pont-Sorribes, C., & Vállez, M. (2023). Use of generative artificial intelligence in the training of journalists: challenges, uses and training proposal. Profesional De La información, 32(4). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.jul.08

Macalintal, A. (2024). Trustworthy AI: A Comparative Study of AI in Journalism in Singapore and the Philippines. The Journal of Communication and Media Studies, 9 (1), 99-123. https://doi.org/10.18848/2470-9247/CGP/v09i01/99-123

Malakar, P. & Leeladharan, M. (2024). Generative AI Tools for Collaborative Content Creation: A Comparative Analysis. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 44 (3), 151-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.14429/djlit.44.3.19698

Matz, S.; Teeny, J.; Vaid, S.; Peters, H.; Harari, G. & Cerf, M. (2024). The potential of generative AI for personalized persuasion at scale. Scientific Reports 14, 4692. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53755-0

Menacho, M.; Pizarro, L.; Osorio, J.; Osorio, J. A. y León, B. (2024). Inteligencia artificial como herramienta en el aprendizaje autónomo de los estudiantes de educación superior. Revista InveCom, 4(2), e040258. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10693945

Moya, B. & Eaton, S. (2023). Examining Recommendations for Artificial Intelligence Use with Integrity from a Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Lens. Relieve, 29(2). http://doi.org/10.30827/relieve.v29i2.29295

Ooi, K.; Tan, G.; Al-Emran, M.; Al-Sharafi, M.; Capatina, A.; Chakraborty, A. … & Wong, L. (2023). The Potential of Generative Artificial Intelligence Across Disciplines: Perspectives and Future Directions. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2023.2261010

Orchard, T. & Tasiemski, L. (2023). The rise of generative AI and possible effects on the economy. Economics and Business Review, 9(2).

https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2023.2.732

Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura (UNESCO, 08 de junio de 2023a). Una encuesta de la UNESCO revela que menos del 10% de las escuelas y universidades disponen de orientaciones formales sobre IA. https://www.unesco.org/es/articles/una-encuesta-de-la-unesco-revela-que-menos-del-10-de-las-escuelas-y-universidades-disponen-de

Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura (UNESCO, 2023b). ChatGPT e Inteligencia Artificial en la educación superior. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385146_spa

Peña, S., Meso, K., Larrondo, A. & Dí¬az, J. (2023). Without journalists, there is no journalism: the social dimension of generative artificial intelligence in the media. Profesional De La información, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.mar.27

Peres, R.; Schreier, M.; Schweidel, D. & Sorescu, A. (2023). On ChatGPT and beyond: How generative artificial intelligence may affect research, teaching, and practice. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 40 (2), 269-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2023.03.001

Reid, J. (2024). Risks of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI)-assisted scams on online sharing-economy platforms. The African Journal of Information and Communication (AJIC), 33, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.23962/ajic.i33.18162

Rodrigues, J.; de Souza, M.; Serrano, A. & Campello, B. (2024). An Analysis of the Generative AI use as analyst in qualitative research in science education. Revista Pesquisa Qualitativa, 12(30), 01–29. https://doi.org/10.33361/RPQ.2024.v.12.n.30.724

Ryzkho, O., Krainikova, T., Vodolazka, S. & Sokolova, K. (2024). Generative AI changes the book publishing industry: reengineering of business processes. Communication & Society, 37(3), 255-271. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.37.3.255-271

Schneider, J. (2024). Explainable Generative AI (GenXAI): a survey, conceptualization, and research agenda. Artif Intell Rev 57, 289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10916-x

Singh, M. (2023). Maintaining the Integrity of the South African University: The Impact of ChatGPT on Plagiarism and Scholarly Writing. South African Journal of Higher Education 37 (5), 203-20. https://doi.org/10.20853/37-5-5941

Szczesniewski, J; Ramos, A.; Rodríguez, P.; Lorenzo, M.; Sainz, J & Llanes, L. (2024). Quality of information about urologic pathology in English and Spanish from ChatGPT, BARD, and Copilot. Actas Urológicas Españolas 48, (398-403). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuroe.2024.02.009

Talaei, A., Yang, A. & Masialeti, M. (2024). How does incorporating ChatGPT within a firm reinforce agility-mediated performance? The moderating role of innovation infusion and firms’ ethical identity. Technovation, 132(1).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.102975

Tramallino, C. y Marize, A. (2024). Avances y discusiones sobre el uso de inteligencia artificial (IA) en educación. Educación, 33(64), 29-54. https://doi.org/10.18800/educacion.202401.M002

Tshidi, M. & Dewa, A. (2024). The promise and peril of Coding & Robotics education in South Africa: A scoping review of teacher preparation and generative artificial intelligence's potential for delivering equity. Journal of Education, (96), 140-164. https://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2520-9868/i96a08

Walczak, K. & Cellary, W. (2023). Challenges for higher education in the era of widespread access to generative AI. Economics and Business Review, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2023.2.743

Zhou, E. & Lee, D. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence, human creativity, and art. PNAS Nexus, 3(3), 052. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae052

Published

2025-04-30

How to Cite

Chocobar Reyes, E., Ubillús Reyes , J., & Cevallos López, G. (2025). Only ChatGPT? Different Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools and their uses: A review of the scientific literature, 2021 – 2024. Ucsa, 12(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.18004/ucsa/2409-8752/2025.012.01.070

Most read articles by the same author(s)